Andre Vltchek and Western Academia

Andre Vltchek

Once upon a time Natural Philosophy was an honest intellectual journey of discovery.

Natural philosophy or the philosophy of nature (from Latin philosophia naturalis) was the philosophical study of nature and the physical universe that was dominant before the development of modern science.

It is considered to be the precursor of natural sciences.

Then along came Isaac Newton, Leaned Societies and state patronage.

In any event, a bias favoring Newton tainted the whole affair from the outset.

The Royal Society set up a committee to pronounce on the priority dispute, in response to a letter it had received from Leibniz.

That committee never asked Leibniz to give his version of the events.

The report of the committee, finding in favor of Newton, was written by Newton himself and published as “Commercium Epistolicum” (mentioned above) early in 1713.

The President, Council, and Fellows of the Royal Society of London for Improving Natural Knowledge, commonly known as the Royal Society, is a learned society for science and is possibly the oldest such society still in existence.

Founded in November 1660, it was granted a royal charter by King Charles II as “The Royal Society”.

And, after three hundred years of attrition, Natural Philosophy has become Settled Science and Natural Philosophers have [generally] been displaced by Anaemic Academics.

Andre Vltchek describes these Anaemic Academics as a “whoring and servile Western academic gang”.

In ancient Greece and China, people were able to understand the majority of their philosophers.

There was nothing “exclusive” in the desire to know and interpret the world. Philosophers spoke to the people, for the people.

Some still do.

But that whoring and servile Western academic gang, which has locked philosophy behind the university walls, viciously sidelines such men and women.

Instead of leading people to the barricades, instead of addressing the most urgent issues our world is now facing, official philosophers are fighting amongst themselves for tenures, offering their brains and bodies to the Empire.

At best, they are endlessly recycling each other, spoiling millions of pages of paper with footnotes, comparing conclusions made by Derrida and Nietzsche, hopelessly stuck at exhausted ideas of Kant and Hegel.

At worst, they are outrightly evil – making still relevant revolutionary philosophical concepts totally incomprehensible, attacking them, and even disappearing them from the face of the Earth.

Western academia is rigidly defining, which lines of thought are acceptable for philosophers to use, as well as what analyses, and what forms.

Those who refuse to comply are ‘not true philosophers’.

They are dilettantes, ‘amateurs’.

Academia: Hands off Revolutionary Philosophy! – Andre Vltchek – 26 Feb 2016

André Vltchek (born 1963) is a novelist, philosopher, investigative journalist, filmmaker, photographer and playwright.

He has covered dozens of war zones and conflicts from Bosnia and Peru to Sri Lanka, DR Congo and Timor-Leste.

After living for many years in Latin America and Oceania, Vltchek presently resides and works in Asia and Africa.

Tragically, the Anaemic Academics have re-established the familiar Church and State oligarchy by infecting academia with their Settled Science belief system.

The separation of church and state is a concept defining the distance in the relationship between organized religion and the nation state.

It may refer to creating a secular state, with or without explicit reference to such separation, or to changing an existing relationship of church involvement in a state (disestablishment).

Although the concept of separation has been adopted in a number of countries, there are varying degrees of separation depending on the applicable legal structures and prevalent views toward the proper relationship between religion and politics.

Oligarchy (from Greek ὀλιγαρχία (oligarkhía); from ὀλίγος (olígos), meaning “few”, and ἄρχω (arkho), meaning “to rule or to command”) is a form of power structure in which power effectively rests with a small number of people.

These people might be distinguished by royalty, wealth, family ties, education, corporate, religious or military control.

Welcome to the new and improved Dark Ages with multiple Memory Holes and bulging Black Holes.

The medieval period is frequently caricatured as supposedly a “time of ignorance and superstition” which placed “the word of religious authorities over personal experience and rational activity.”

A memory hole is any mechanism for the alteration or disappearance of inconvenient or embarrassing documents, photographs, transcripts, or other records, such as from a website or other archive, particularly as part of an attempt to give the impression that something never happened.

The concept was first popularized by George Orwell’s dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, where the Party’s Ministry of Truth systematically re-created all potential historical documents, in effect, re-writing all of history to match the often-changing state propaganda.

A black holeis a region of spacetime exhibiting such strong gravitational effects that nothing – including particles and electromagnetic radiation such as light – can escape from inside it.

`Thinking again?’ the Duchess asked, with another dig of her sharp little chin.

`I’ve a right to think,’ said Alice sharply, for she was beginning to feel a little worried.

`Just about as much right,’ said the Duchess, `as pigs have to fly; and the m–‘

But here, to Alice’s great surprise, the Duchess’s voice died away, even in the middle of her favourite word `moral,’ and the arm that was linked into hers began to tremble.

Alice looked up, and there stood the Queen in front of them, with her arms folded, frowning like a thunderstorm.

Chapter IX – The Mock Turtle’s Story
Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland – Lewis Carroll – 1865

Such is the pendulum of history.

Gallery | This entry was posted in History, Science. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Andre Vltchek and Western Academia

  1. The unnerving aspect is that often the fabrication of history by the present day incumbents is often done subconsciously and since they are also in charge of academia, history ends up being rewritten and few any the wiser.

  2. andrewfitts says:

    The fabrication can be either willful or subconscious, depending on who is writing the history. Add the element of collusion by the masses willing to not know something, and there is a great chance that we are living a lie. We want the wool covered over our eyes, or at least the bulk of the population does. It’s too much work to sort it out yourself and to realize that most information sources are unreliable. We need religion and big daddy gubbamint to tell us what to do because we don’t want to live in fear of our own ignorance.

    The deeper you go down the rabbit hole, the greater the realization that much of what we call reality is just a matrix of deception.

    A scary place to live if you come upon the thought that we really don’t know what the f*ck is going on.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.