Vitrified Forts – Louis Hissink – Laterite Thinking

Louis Hissink - Laterite Thinking

One of the more mysterious geological occurrences is the surface vitrification observed coating may rock outcrops.

In the Kimberley region of Western Australia ancient rock paintings known as the Bradshaw Paintings are covered by a thin silicious coating that has permanently fused the painted art onto the rock surface, making this art particularly fire-resistant.

Bradshaw rock paintings

Modern aboriginal paintings are, on the other hand, directly painted and soon show the effects of weathering.

The sandstones in the Kimberley region are also coated with a surficial vitrification, a feature that can be observed elsewhere in Australia, such as Arnhem Land, and the Hawkesbury sandstone of the Sydney Basin that has been described as a quartzite, but at depth is actually in a state of wet plastic, a fact I stumbled on when supervising a diamond drilling operation testing the location of a fault interpreted in the geological analysis of a proposed railway tunnel for coal haulage near the NSW town of Wollongong.

Apparently similar vitrification has been observed on Easter Island, and of course the various “vitrified” forts described here in previous posts.

The puzzle lies in the origin of this vitrification. What is it?

Basically it seems to be similar to the thermal effects of a nuclear explosion where a sudden flash of extremely high temperature causes partial melting of the surface of rocks and stone structures that then cooled rapidly and left a glassy or vitrified coating. It is similar to some methods of glazing used in the production of baked clay utensils and bricks etc.

Nuclear explosions are electric plasma explosions, to put it simply, and yield a flash of intense heat and radiation.

Lechatelierite is a mineraloid as it does not have a crystal structure.

Although not a true mineral, it is often classified in the quartz mineral group.

One common way in which lechatelierite forms naturally is by very high temperature melting of quartz sand during a lightning strike.

The result is an irregular, branching, often foamy hollow tube of silica glass called a fulgurite.

Fulgurites

Lechatelierite also forms as the result of high pressure shock metamorphism during meteorite impact cratering and is a common component of a type of glassy ejecta called tektites.

Tektites

Most tektites are blobs of impure glassy material, but tektites from the Sahara Desert in Libya and Egypt, known as Libyan desert glass, are composed of almost pure silica, that is almost pure lechatelierite.

Lechatelierite

High pressure experiments have shown that shock pressures of 85 GPa are needed to produce lechatelierite in quartz grains embedded in granite.

Lechatelierite was formed during the impact of a meteorite into a layer of Coconino Sandstone at Meteor Crater in Arizona. During the rapid pressure reduction following the impact, steam expanded the newly formed lechatelierite. The shattered and expanded glass has a density less than that of water.

Lechatelierite may also form artificially, a unique example being the trinitite produced by melting of quartz sand at the first nuclear bomb explosion at Trinity Flats, White Sands, New Mexico.

Trinitite

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lechatelierite

One of archaeology’s puzzles identified by John Dayton and described in his book Minerals, Metals, Glazing and Man is the apparent anachronism of glazing found on artefacts assigned to pre Bronze and Iron Age eras. Charles Ginenthal has also discussed this issue in volume one of his Pillars of History series.

The pyramid-builders, for example, had knowledge of pottery and glassmaking techniques which they should not have possessed, knowledge which scholars would not have expected before the first millennium BC.

Thus in his Minerals, Metals, Glazing, and Man, the mineralogist John Dayton remarked on the advanced glazing techniques employed by the pyramid-builders.

Certain colors of glaze, for example, which could not have been known before the Late Bronze Age, were already being employed during the Pyramid Age.

In the tomb of queen Hetepheres, the mother of Cheops, Dayton noted the occurrence of “Tiny ring beads in blue, black, red and yellow” which are among the “mysteries of archaeology”.

According to Dayton, “If these [beads] were of faience, the tomb must date to the XVIIIth [18th] Dynasty.

Again, Dayton remarked on how certain colors of glaze found in Sixth Dynasty pottery could not have been developed much before the Eighteenth Dynasty.

The Pyramid Age – Emmet Sweeney -2007
https://www.amazon.co.uk/Pyramid-Age-Vol-Ages-Alignment/dp/0875865666/
http://www.amazon.com/Pyramid-Age-Ages-Alignment/dp/0875865666

It has occurred to me that so-called anachronistic glazing found among some archaeological remains might not have been created by man but may instead have been caused by a similar external geological forcing implied by the geological surface vitrification observed in the field elsewhere.

I find it puzzling that any civilisation would expend time and energy to mass produce glazed bricks and carvings for external decoration of buildings as implied by the glazed artefacts of ancient Babylon pictured by Dayton on his plate 25 and 26.

The Babylonians had the time and resources to glaze individual bricks and ornaments?

Did the ancient Egyptians bother glazing their external decorations?

Or was the destruction of the Mesopotamian civilisation associated with a global plasma related event that literally baked everything in its path?

It is more likely that the buildings and ornaments were simply painted and that a subsequent catastrophic event literally ‘cooked’ the structures imparting the glaze.

Glaze in this context is no different to thermally induced vitrification of rock outcrops and might have been caused by the same event.

Was glazing ubiquitous during the Bronze and Iron Ages?

Was pottery found in graves glazed or unglazed?

What might happen to standard baked bricks when exposed to a nuclear explosion?

Would the bricks become vitrified?

Vitrified Brick

Is it purely a thermal process or is it also due to the intense electromagnetic radiation pulse typical of plasma Z-Pinches as well?

Or a combination of both where the molecular structure is suddenly altered?

I would also check to see if any of these glazed artefacts have any residual radioactivity. If so then the cause of the vitrification would be some sort of nuclear or plasma event.

And if this proposed plasma pulse did actually happen in the past, might it also have produced the globally extensive silicate sands from the electro-machining of the Earth’s surface as implied by the Australian aboriginal rainbow serpent stories?

Western Australia does have radioactive siliceous surface deposits known as ‘grey-billy’ or ‘laterites’, the iron rich variation which are also frequently radioactive.

Laterite is a soil and rock type rich in iron and aluminium, and is commonly considered to have formed in hot and wet tropical areas.

Nearly all laterites are of rusty-red coloration, because of high iron oxide content.

Laterite

Laterites are a source of aluminium ore; the ore exists largely in clay minerals and the hydroxides, gibbsite, boehmite, and diaspore, which resembles the composition of bauxite.

Laterite ores also were the early major source of nickel.

Laterites consist mainly of quartz, zircon, and oxides of titanium, iron, tin, aluminium and manganese, which remain during the course of weathering.

The main host minerals for nickel and cobalt can be either iron oxides, clay minerals or manganese oxides.

Yves Tardy, from the French Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, calculated that laterites cover about one-third of the Earth’s continental land area.

Cutting of laterite brickstones

They cover most of the land area between the tropics of Cancer and Capricorn; areas not covered within these latitudes include the extreme western portion of South America, the southwestern portion of Africa, the desert regions of north-central Africa, the Arabian peninsula and the interior of Australia.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laterite

It might be possible to test these scenarios experimentally but playing around with Z-Pinch experiments is not for the faint-hearted or impecunious.

Instead a check to see if any of the glazed items are radioactive would be an initial measurement to test the theory.

After 1000 CE Angkorian construction changed from circular or irregular earthen walls to rectangular temple enclosures of laterite, brick and stone structures.

Geographic surveys show areas which have laterite stone alignments which may be foundations of temple sites that have not survived.

Two types of laterite can be identified; both types consist of the minerals kaolinite, quartz, hematite and goethite.

Differences in the amounts of minor elements arsenic, antimony, vanadium and strontium were measured between the two laterites.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laterite

Strontium is a chemical element with symbol Sr and atomic number 38.

An alkaline earth metal, strontium is a soft silver-white or yellowish metallic element that is highly reactive chemically.

The metal turns yellow when it is exposed to air.

While natural strontium is stable, the synthetic 90Sr isotope is present in radioactive fallout and has a half-life of 28.90 years.

Both strontium and strontianite are named after Strontian, a village in Scotland near which the mineral was discovered in 1790 by Adair Crawford and William Cruickshank.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strontium

Strontian is the main village in Sunart, an area in western Lochaber, Highland, Scotland, on the A861 road.

The history of mining in the Strontian area dates to 1722, when Sir Alexander Murray discovered galena in the hills the region.

Various materials have been mined here including lead, and strontianite, which contains the element named after the village, Strontium.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strontian

Mine workings at Strontian

All rather unsettling in a scientific sense, no?

Advertisements
Gallery | This entry was posted in Catastrophism, Geology, History, Vitrified Hill Forts. Bookmark the permalink.

9 Responses to Vitrified Forts – Louis Hissink – Laterite Thinking

  1. tallbloke says:

    Strontian is the modern form of the Gallic ‘Sron an t-Sithein’ – The point of the Faeries. Or ‘Furies’ perhaps?

    Maybe there’s more than one way to skin a rock. Big doses of EMR are one. Could the hill fort rocks glued together with vitrefied ‘mortar’ be evidence of some other lost (and perhaps re-found) formula.

    Ever wondered what ‘Greekfire’ was?

    http://www.britannica.com/technology/Greek-fire

    Thanks for this latest instalment in an interesting read.

  2. oldbrew says:

    From a BBC report in 2006:
    ‘The first atomic bomb detonation, at the Trinity site in New Mexico in 1945, created a thin layer of glass on the sand. But the area of glass in the Egyptian desert is vastly bigger.

    Whatever happened in Egypt must have been much more powerful than an atomic bomb.’
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/5196362.stm

  3. THX1138 says:

    Congratulations, Louis Hissink, I see you have met Peter Mungo Jupp!

    Meteorite impacts should be considered a very rare, and unlikely event. More likely, electrical interactions are the cause of vitrification, melting and formation of different minerals. You’ll notice that even in recent meteor interactions on Earth, i.e. the Tunguska event, there is no impact crater, and in fact the bolide cannot be found. The same in the recent Russian event, where the aerial explosion of the bolide caused widespread damage to buildings, no impact crater. That’s because the electrical interaction with the object precludes an actual physical impact. The object explodes from electrical stresses within the rocky body (and not from frictional heat as it travels through the atmosphere). Visual evidence of the electrical nature of the event is shown in the extremely bright arcing discharge coming from the bolide, much like an arc welder.

    In the photo at the top, the eye-shaped symbol in the upper left corner has been identified worldwide as indicating Venus (or Isis, and many other names globally). The “pupil” in the eye is Mars. The streamers emanating from the eye indicates an electrical coronal discharge, which was visible between Earth, Mars and Venus as they slowly adopted their new orbits around the current sun, during a period of time called the “Polar Configuration” of Earth, Mars, Venus and Saturn. Even today, Venus has a plasma trail (a Birkeland Current) connection to the Earth during close encounters in their orbits.

    The wispy body shapes also in the photo are likely the artists’ interpretations of the streamers of plasma exchange with Earth, which was visible globally, and depicted in many ways in rock art by may different people of many different cultures. (Anthony Peratt and his team identified millions of such petroglyph documentations of these events worldwide.)

    These electrical interactions would be a much more fruitful subject of your investigation into the vitrification of these forts.

    • THX1138,

      Thanks for the heads up.

      Yes I’m quite familiar with electric universe and plasma universe theories and the role of electricity in geological processes. I have been involved in this area since 1988 when I worked as a professional diamond exploration geologist. I regard kimberlite eruptions to be caused by external plasma forcings, for example, and also researched by Russian scientist Konstantin Khazanovitch-Wulff and published in the NCGT Journal. The Russians are way ahead in this area, I have discovered but limit their theories to the standard uniformitarian chronology.

      Peratt and I had frequent exchanges of information over the years, mainly with field work issues recording data and of course secret plasma business. Working in the diamond exploration business allowed me to visit parts of Australia (etc) that no one, not even geological survey scientists, would need to visit, so I have observed much that others haven’t. I have also visited petroglyphs in southern Africa when I worked for De Beers.

      I’ve tentatively assigned the global vitrification event to the Roman Termination Event (RTE) and have also assigned the Australian Aboriginal Dreamtime period to the same time period. Mainstream date it to the Dryas event, 11,000 BC, etc. But I put it at or close to the Heinsohn Event. The vitrified Bradshaw Art in this neck of the woods would have also occurred during the 1st millennium. Bit radical, even for Mungo I suspect.

      I assume vigorous discussion is also happening at the conference.

      Please pass my warm regards to Mungo

  4. Pingback: Myths of the Cherokee: Struck by Lightning | MalagaBay

  5. oldbrew says:

    FYI: re Libyan desert glass – this site was updated a few weeks ago.

    The non-impact origin of the Libyan Desert Glass (LDG)
    March 2006
    Norbert Brügge, Germany
    Dipl.-Geol.
    Update: 09.11.2016
    http://www.b14643.de/Sahara/LDG/

  6. malagabay says:

    Thanks Oldbrew.

    The major oxides in Libyan Desert Glass: Al2O3, MgO, FeO, and TiO2
    With minor concentrations of: Cr2 O3, MnO, and CaO
    And some streak enrichments of: Ni, and Zr

    Brownish inclusions and dark streaks in Libyan Desert Glass
    A. Greshake, Ch. Koeberl, J. Fritz and U. Reimold
    Meteoritics & Planetary Science 45, Nr 6, 973–989 (2010)

    Transparent Spherules

    Tiny bubbles are abundant in the spherules and cause partial brownish staining.

    Viewed with cross polarized light, the spherules appear completely birefringent and show pronounced twin lamellae.

    Electron microprobe analyses indicate that the spherules have, on average, higher SiO2 (approximately 99.8 wt%) and lower major oxide concentrations (e.g., Al2O3, MgO, FeO, and TiO2) than the surrounding LDG glass.

    Brownish Inclusions

    Electron microprobe analysis revealed that angular grains and droplets have very similar chemical compositions.

    All these phases contain considerable amounts of silica (approximately 53–54 wt% SiO2) with approximately 5–6 wt% Al2O3, approximately 23–24 wt% MgO, approximately 14–15 wt% FeO, and minor concentrations of TiO2, Cr2 O3, MnO, and CaO.

    Analyses also indicate poor stoichiometry of the phases attesting to a low degree of crystallinity.

    These compositions most closely resemble that of an Al-rich orthopyroxene.

    Dark Streaks

    Electron microprobe analyses and X-ray elemental mapping of several regions within streaks show a strongly heterogeneous distribution of Al, Si, Mg, and––more rarely and less pronounced––of Fe and Ti.

    The Micro-XRF mapping clearly shows enrichments and good correlation of the abundances of Mn, Cr, Fe, and Ni in the dark streaks.

    The Zr distribution map shows the presence of distinct Zr-rich spots, probably zircon or baddeleyite.

    From: http://www.b14643.de/Sahara/LDG/

    There appear to be many similarities with the “micro and nanoparticles encountered in the lightning products of the struck pine tree at Allanche”.

    Fuel Origin and Firing Product Preservation In Archaeological Occupation Contexts
    Marie-Agnès Courty – Quaternary International (2016)

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295242279_Fuel_origin_and_firing_product_preservation_in_archaeological_occupation_contexts

    See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2016/12/02/myths-of-the-cherokee-struck-by-lightning/

    But the general area for Libyan Desert Glass currently has an abnormally low incidence of lightning for its latitude.

    So it seems possible that Libyan Desert Glass is in the realm of Louis Hissink’s Rainbow Serpent Mechanism (RSM).

    • In this case the RSM might occur as sheet lightning, laterally extensive sheets of electrified plasma moving on top of a water saturated surface. This would, depending on the chemical nature of the substrate, result in a thin veneer of micropisolites of silica as described in the Libyan example.

      Similar manganese deposits occur at the western edge of the Gibson Desert near Jigalong Aboriginal settlement. Here the pisolites are small manganese spheres.

      The hydrothermal link made by Brugge is probably correct but they are totally stymied by their adherence to the standard chronology. A sort of chronological Elephant and 7 Indian holy men allegory. Yet they recognise the necessity of water in the process which they can’t explain easily because of chronological issues. Once you realise the Sahara was originally an epicontinental sea or lake which was then ‘zapped’ by electrified plasma or thunderbolts for a period of time, plausible solutions to the silicious pisolites are possible.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s