Ian Plimer: Not For The Greens

Ian Plimer - Not For The Greens

Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome, in the Green Corner, the caped crusaders fighting for climate justice and A New American Dark Age.

In a move spearheaded by environmentalists, the Portland Public Schools board unanimously approved a resolution aimed at eliminating doubt of climate change and its causes in schools.

“It is unacceptable that we have textbooks in our schools that spread doubt about the human causes and urgency of the crisis,” said Lincoln High School student Gaby Lemieux in board testimony. “Climate education is not a niche or a specialization, it is the minimum requirement for my generation to be successful in our changing world.”

The resolution passed Tuesday evening calls for the school district to get rid of textbooks or other materials that cast doubt on whether climate change is occurring and that the activity of human beings is responsible. The resolution also directs the superintendent and staff to develop an implementation plan for “curriculum and educational opportunities that address climate change and climate justice in all Portland Public Schools.”

Portland School Board Bans Climate Change-Denying Materials
Portland Tribune – Shasta Kearns Moore – 19 May 2016

http://portlandtribune.com/sl/307848-185832-portland-school-board-bans-climate-change-denying-materials

And in the Not For Greens Corner, one of the last lingering lecturers from The Age of Enlightenment, please welcome Ian Plimer.

Ian Rutherford Plimer (born 12 February 1946) is an Australian geologist, professor emeritus of earth sciences at the University of Melbourne, professor of mining geology at the University of Adelaide, and the director of multiple mineral exploration and mining companies.

He has published many scientific papers, six books and is one of the co-editors of Encyclopedia of Geology.

He has been an outspoken critic of both creationism and the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change.

Carbon dioxide has an effect on the atmosphere and it has an effect for the first 50 parts per million and once it’s done its job then it’s finished and you can double it and quadruple it and it has no effect because we’ve seen that in the geological past, and we’ve seen it in times gone by when the carbon dioxide content was 100 times the current content.

We didn’t have runaway global warming, we actually had glaciation, so there’s immediately a disconnect.

So carbon dioxide is absolutely vital for living on earth; it’s plant food, all of life lives off carbon dioxide.

To demonise it shows that you don’t understand school child science.

Ian Plimer, interviewed on ABNNewswire, June 2009

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_plimer

The Enlightenment – known in French as the Siècle des Lumières, the Century of Enlightenment, and in German as the Aufklärung – was a philosophical movement which dominated the world of ideas in Europe in the 18th century.

The Enlightenment included a range of ideas centered on reason as the primary source of authority and legitimacy, and came to advance ideals such as liberty, progress, tolerance, fraternity, constitutional government and ending the abuses of the church and state.

In France, the central doctrines of the Lumières were individual liberty and religious tolerance, in opposition to the principle of absolute monarchy and the fixed dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church.

The Enlightenment was marked by increasing empiricism, scientific rigor, and reductionism, along with increased questioning of religious orthodoxy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_enlightenment

The debate today will be over two rounds.

In the first round Ian Plimer promotes the Not For Greens perspective.

Not For Greens

The processes required to make a humble stainless steel teaspoon are remarkably complicated and every stage involves risk, coal, energy, capital, international trade and finance.

Stainless steel cutlery has taken thousands of years of experimentation and knowledge to evolve and the end result is that we can eat without killing ourselves with bacteria.

We are in the best times to have ever lived on planet Earth and the future will only be better.

All this we take for granted.

Greens may have started as genuine environmentalists.

Much of the green movement has now morphed into an unelected extremist political pressure group accountable to no one.

Greens create problems, many of which are concocted, and provide no solutions because of a lack of basic knowledge.

This book examines green policies in the light of established knowledge and shows that they are unrealistic.

Policies by greens adopted by supine governments have resulted in rising costs, increased taxes, political instability, energy poverty, decreased longevity and environmental degradation and they don’t achieve their ideological aims.

Wind, solar and biomass energy emit more carbon dioxide than they save and reduction of carbon dioxide emissions does nothing to change climate and only empties the pocket.

No stainless steel teaspoon could be made using green “alternative energy”.

This book argues that unless the greens live sustainably in caves in the forest and use no trappings of the modern world, then they should be regarded as hypocrites and treated with the disdain they deserve.

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Not-Greens-Devil-Should-Spoon/dp/1925138194/
http://www.amazon.com/Not-Greens-Devil-Should-Spoon/dp/1925138194

Ladies and gentlemen, the second round has been cancelled because the judges, kindly sponsored by numerous A New American Dark Age foundations, have already awarded the contest [and the contracts] to the caped crusaders for climate justice.

Let’s hear it for the caped crusaders for climate justice!

Applause

Come on now.

I said: Let’s hear it for the caped crusaders for climate justice!

No one is leaving until morale improves and I hear that applause…

OK. Have it your own way.

Security – turn out the lights!

We’re done.

Advertisements
Gallery | This entry was posted in Atmospheric Science, Books, Science. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Ian Plimer: Not For The Greens

  1. oldbrew says:

    Reblogged this on Tallbloke's Talkshop and commented:
    Looks like we’ll be stuck in an age of un-enlightenment at least until the planet cools down a bit.

  2. Terrible, I say.

    It’s just Terrible.

    CO2 is making Earth greener—for now

    A quarter to half of Earth’s vegetated lands has shown significant greening over the last 35 years largely due to rising levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide, according to a new study published in the journal Nature Climate Change on April 25.

    Green leaves use energy from sunlight through photosynthesis to chemically combine carbon dioxide drawn in from the air with water and nutrients tapped from the ground to produce sugars, which are the main source of food, fiber and fuel for life on Earth. Studies have shown that increased concentrations of carbon dioxide increase photosynthesis, spurring plant growth.

    Clearly, Plants are trying to kill Human Beings and take over the Planet. SLASH AND BURN!

    OH!- and more plastic – please.

  3. RdM says:

    ” Carbon dioxide has an effect on the atmosphere and it has an effect for the first 50 parts per million and once it’s done its job then it’s finished and you can double it and quadruple it and it has no effect because we’ve seen that in the geological past, and we’ve seen it in times gone by when the carbon dioxide content was 100 times the current content.

    We didn’t have runaway global warming, we actually had glaciation, so there’s immediately a disconnect.”

    Which immediately relates to your previous post, I think
    https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2016/01/28/murry-salby-control-of-atmospheric-co2/

  4. The historical interest lies in Carl Sagan’s invocation of a runaway greenhouse effect on Venus to explain its highly anomalous hot temperature. Velikovsky reckoned Venus is hot because it is a newly formed planet. Before the space probes could be used to measure its temperature, Venus was believed to be similar to the Earth in physical state, albeit more cloudy.

    James Hansen did his Phd on Venusian CO2 under Sagan.

    So where from did Hansen get his runaway CO2 effect idea? Which more or less led to the climate catastrophe that mainstream science is gulled into believing.

    The problem is that if Venus is young, then the standard cosmic model has, er, problems, but these cannot be publicly pointed to or mentioned except by certified cranks, who are ignored in any case.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s