P. N. Oak claimed the “blundering” Academics in Aspic have “forgotten” there was once a Worldwide Vedic Culture that spoke Sanskrit.
It is also unknown that in the remote forgotten past the Hindus i.e. the Aryans had a world empire and that the world then spoke Sanskrit.
That is why most people in the world call themselves Aryans and speak Sanskritized languages like Latin and Persian.
Some Missing Chapters of World History – P. N. Oak – 2010 Edition
https://ia800204.us.archive.org/0/items/EnglishBooksOfP.n.Oak/SomeMissingChapterOfWorldHistory_text.pdfVedic Sanskrit is an Old Indo-Aryan language. It is the spoken ancestor of liturgical Sanskrit, and an early descendant of Proto-Indo-Aryan.
It is closely related to Avestan, the oldest preserved of the Iranian languages.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vedic_Sanskrit
The Indo-European languages are a family of several hundred related languages and dialects.
There are about 445 living Indo-European languages, according to the estimate by Ethnologue, with over two-thirds (313) of them belonging to the Indo-Iranian branch.
The most widely-spoken Indo-European languages by native speakers are Spanish, English, Hindi, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, and Punjabi, each with over 100 million speakers.
Today, 46% of the human population speaks an Indo-European language, by far the most of any language family.
On the the other hand: academia considers P. N. Oak a delusional crackpot and have summarily rejected his pseudo-scholarship.
Srinivas Aravamudan concludes that via “deep punning” Oak is “creative in proliferating these delusional etymologies.”
…
Edwin Bryant writes that most academics would consider him a ‘crackpot’.Giles Tillotson describes his work as a “startling piece of pseudo-scholarship”.
Clearly, the Academics in Aspic don’t like the idea that they [and their Indo-European languages] are descended from an Indian mother whose mother tongue was Sanskrit.
A first language (also native language, father tongue/mother tongue, arterial language, or L1) is the language or are the languages a person has learned from birth or within the critical period, or that a person speaks the best and so is often the basis for sociolinguistic identity [citation needed].
In some countries, the terms native language or mother tongue refer to the language of one’s ethnic group rather than one’s first language.
Children brought up speaking more than one language can have more than one native language, and be bilingual.
By contrast, a second language is any language that one speaks other than one’s first language.
Accordingly, the “blundering” Academics in Aspic have enshrined their prejudices in an Indo-European Language Tree by inventing multiple layers of imaginary pseudo-babble [the small white boxes in the diagram below] which suggests [surprise! surprise!] that English is not a dialect of Sanskrit.
There are about 445 living Indo-European languages, according to the estimate by Ethnologue, with over two-thirds (313) of them belonging to the Indo-Iranian branch.
The most widely-spoken Indo-European languages by native speakers are Spanish, English, Hindi, Portuguese, Bengali, Russian, and Punjabi, each with over 100 million speakers.
Today, 46% of the human population speaks an Indo-European language, by far the most of any language family.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indo-European_languages
Similarly, the “blundering” Academics in Aspic have enshrined their Out of Africa prejudices in a Mitochondrial DNA Tree based upon the belief that they are descended from a Mitochondrial Eve who “most likely” lived in East Africa “between 99,000 and 200,000 years ago”.
In human genetics, Mitochondrial Eve is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of all currently living humans.
This is the most recent woman from whom all living humans today descend, in an unbroken line, on their mother’s side, and through the mothers of those mothers, and so on, back until all lines converge on one woman, who is estimated to have lived approximately 100,000–200,000 years ago.
…
Mitochondrial Eve is estimated to have lived between 99,000 and 200,000 years ago, most likely in East Africa, when Homo sapiens sapiens (anatomically modern humans) were developing as a population distinct from other human sub-species.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_T_%28mtDNA%29
In sexual reproduction, mitochondria are normally inherited exclusively from the mother; the mitochondria in mammalian sperm are usually destroyed by the egg cell after fertilization.
Unsurprisingly, the “blundering” Academics in Aspic are experiencing a few problems with their grand top down theories because [as any sensible genealogist knows] human history is best traced “backward in time” from the present i.e. bottom up.
As a rule, genealogists begin with the present and work backward in time.
For example, evidence suggests the [originally deemed Out of Africa] L3 mitochondrial DNA haplogroup actually “arose in the Middle East”.
Haplogroup L3 is a human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) haplogroup.
The clade has played a pivotal role in the prehistory of the human species.
It represents the most common parent maternal lineage of all people outside of Africa, and for many individuals within the continent as well.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_L3_%28mtDNA%29
Taken together, these analyses suggest that the L3 haplogroup found in the Saudi were present before the bottleneck 50,000 YBP.
Given the TMRCA estimates for the L3 haplogroup of approximately 70,000 YBP and the timing of the Out-of-Africa split, these analyses suggest that L3 haplogroup arose in the Middle East with a subsequent back migration and expansion into Africa over the Horn-of-Africa during the lower sea levels found during the glacial period bottleneck.
The Saudi Arabian Genome Reveals a Two Step Out-of-Africa Migration.
J. J. Farrell, A. K. Al-Ali, L. A. Farrer, A. N. Al-Nafaie, A. M. Al-Rubaish, E. Melista, Z. Naserullah, A. Alsuliman, P. Sebastiani, M. H. Steinberg, C. T. Baldwin
American Society of Human Genetics – 2013 Meeting Highlights
http://www.ashg.org/2013meeting/abstracts/fulltext/f130122833.htm
Similarly, the “blundering” Academics in Aspic are experiencing a few problems explaining away the “archaic features” found in Lithuanian, Ancient Greek and Sanskrit.
Among Indo-European languages, Lithuanian is extraordinarily conservative, retaining many archaic features otherwise found only in ancient languages such as Sanskrit or Ancient Greek.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lithuanian_language
The Lithuanian language is a linguistic pandora’s box that the mainstream has buried under several layers of “glottochronological speculations” and “reconstructed proto-language” invention.
See: https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2016/07/05/catastrophic-english-lithuanian-linguistics/
An Ethno-Cultural Etymological Interconnection? Sounds Incredulous but Real!
Irandokht.com – Davood N. Rahni
http://www.irandokht.com/editorial/index4.php?area=org§ionID=14&editorialID=3338
This is hardly surprising because European mitochondrial DNA appears to track back to India.
On the Structure and Age of Haplogroup JT ˗ A Phylogenetic Tour
J. J. (Jim) Loga – 10 June 2011 – Journal of Genetic Genealogy – http://www.jogg.info
http://www.jogg.info/72/files/Logan.pdf
Which, in turn, suggests Indo-European languages are descended from an Indian [haplogroup N] mother whose mother tongue was Sanskrit.
Wikipedia provides some good entertainment and vigorous hand waving as it tries to keep the Out of Africa storyline afloat by massaging the evidence that the L3 mitochondrial DNA haplogroup actually “arose in the Middle East” [see above].
In human mitochondrial genetics, haplogroup N is a human mitochondrial DNA haplogroup .
An enormous haplogroup spanning many continents, the macro-haplogroup N, like its sibling haplogroup M, is a descendant of haplogroup L3.
The “blundering” Academics in Aspic really need to get their act together…
MalagaBay 
I suspect the Chinese might have an opinion about the existence of a world-wide Hindu world government many years ago.
Pingback: The Arabian Horizon – The Blue Sea | MalagaBay
Pingback: The Red Score: Otto von Sadovszky | MalagaBay
Pingback: Ravenna Revisited: The Deja Vu Dodo | MalagaBay
From Celtic histories I get the impression that the west of britain was populated by a near basque speaking people the east by a mix of proto dutch/english[icenglas] languages, and these were both ‘Sanskritised’ by a people that arrived from the north. Probably whoever these guys were http://www.nessofbrodgar.co.uk/
Pingback: European Islands of Culture | MalagaBay
Pingback: Roman Chronology: The Etruscan Mystery | MalagaBay
Pingback: B for Bikini | MalagaBay
6,000 to 12,000 years ago, the surface of Adam, the Earth, was just the continetal crust. No oceanic basins. The Tibetan Plateau did not exist. It dragged continental crust from Africa etc towards it making the Himalaya etc.
This happened in the exit from EDEN, Aten, our star. Egypt was just another colony of Indians, Dravid. White Aryans evolve pdq affter the sun was in the clear blue sky. The events of the exit from Eden caused Eve to erupt fromTibet. A Tower of plasma filled crust and magma, called the Tower of Babel. Language had been rudimentary until then, given the much greater EMF field, allowing emotional communication, telepathy. Languages developed thereafter, as humans scuttled to clothing, meat construction and agriculture!
China gets its name from the Chin. They have hairy faces as noted in the pottery soldiers. The Han do not!
Aryans untied China. That Empire will soon be dissolved.
Pingback: Ravenna Revealed: Curious Clues | MalagaBay
Pingback: Nippur and The Glass Road | MalagaBay
Pingback: Hecker Horizon: Ho Ho Ho History | MalagaBay
I find it astonishing that the single most direct source of the “saxon” language is never mentioned at all. This is of course the German language of Sachsen (Saxony), nowadays called “Nieder-Sachsen” (Nether-Saxony i.e. Lower Saxony).
This has been quite obvious to me for about 50 years, since I was 10 years of age, because it enabled me to translate about 50% of those amazing cultural british achievements to which I then was, and still am, addicted to: Suzi Quatro, Gary Glitter, The Sweet etcetera.
That is: translate them without having had English in school and without using a dictionary.
Later, having had some years of English language courses at school, it was quite easy to understand the likes of Motörhead, The Sex Pistols, The Exploited etcetera, thus enabling me to help lay the foundations of modern, enlightened, international culture of contemporary Germany that we all enjoy so much today.
Of course, most of the connections between the english language and that of Persia, India and others also apply to the German language.
Jörg Schaper