Sardis 6: Acropolis

The mainstream storyline suggests the inhabitants of Byzantine Sardis were really very “foolish”.


That’s because the Byzantines didn’t build the Sardis Citadel “upon a rock”.

Matthew – Chapter 7

24 Therefore whosoever heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them, I will liken him unto a wise man, which built his house upon a rock:

25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was founded upon a rock.

26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his house upon the sand:

27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the fall of it.

King James Bible Online
https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Matthew-Chapter-7/

The majority view among scholars is that Matthew was a product of the last quarter of the 1st century.

Wikipedia – Gospel of Matthew
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gospel_of_matthew

“Church M” was a small, fourth-century mortuary chapel and the earliest extant Christian church at Sardis built on the abandoned grounds of the Hellenistic Greek Temple of Artemis on the Acropolis.

Wikipedia – Byzantine Churches at Sardis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine_churches_at_Sardis

Click here to continue reading: Sardis 6: Acropolis

This entry was posted in Arabian Horizon, Books, Catastrophism, Geology, Halfway Horizon, Hecker Horizon, Heinsohn Horizon, History, Old Japanese Cedar Tree, Ptolemy’s Paradigm, Roman Chronology, Sardis, Uniformitarianism, Water. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to Sardis 6: Acropolis

  1. Patrick Donnelly says:

    The length of time, 500 years, for the Sol Invictus orbit is strongly supported by the parable of the carpenter’s son in the New Testament. One complete Bethlehem Star cycle and add 30 or 33 years to that. It seems the Old Testament deals with the birth of the Earth, aka Adam, which initiated the torrid zone, night and day and the oceans etc. Earth initially took up the orbit now occupied by Mercury, when the Sun was a bit cooler than now.

    Sol Invictus refers to the death of the Sun and then the resurrection of it.

    Humans did not generally know of the existence of the Sun as a star, until they were outside of it. There may have been upheavals when Adam was inside the Sun, upon ejection of Mars, Apollo, Jupiter etc., but those events would have been minor when compared to the actual massive expansion of the Earth upon its release from stellar pinches. Egypt marked this birth with Aten/Eden being worshipped and the other Gods being neglected, as being of less account.

    The change in Rome of Pantheon over to Christianity reflects an awareness of the Sun and its role.It would only happen, therefore, after the birth of the Earth and the awareness, of the original Saturn as a star and not a polar orientation planet with many satellites, including the Earth. When you describe the Mercury orbit as one of Sol Invictus, you place the birth of Christianity back to the birth of the Earth, when it should better fit the removal of 1,183 or 1,000 years to identify it with the birth of Venus instead.

  2. Patrick Donnelly says:

    The “Crete EQ” might have been the eruption of Thira, also known as, aka, Santorini?

    • malagabay says:

      “The “Crete EQ” might have been the eruption of Thira, also known as, aka, Santorini?”

      Distinct possibility given the state of Radiocarbon Settled Science.

  3. Patrick Donnelly says:

    Ghazi is the same therefore as Viking?

  4. Patrick Donnelly says:

    The Ottomans were red headed, Turkic people who invaded from the East from Asia. Similar people moved to Scandinavia?

  5. Yry says:

    1- I think we are watching a SARDIS series which has now turned into a major
    fascinating SAGA with revolutionary approaches to Antiquity and astrophysics.
    Quite a feat, thank you Tim!

    2- @ Patrick Donnelly
    You said: ” Humans did not generally know of the existence of the Sun as a
    star, until they were outside of it. There may have been upheavals when
    Adam was inside the Sun, upon ejection of Mars, Apollo, Jupiter etc.,”

    ==> Could you clarify “Adam (ie Earth) was inside the Sun” and
    “…until Humans were outside of it (ie of the Sun)” ?

    Cheers.

    • Patrick Donnelly says:

      Adam the Earth was expelled from the garden of Eden. Paradise or heaven. This is where planets are made, inside a star. They go on to become stars themselves, once they are far enough away from the star. Eve is the moon. Once outside the pressure of the stellar z pinch, the planet expands rapidly, with lossof crust and magma at the ‘tangent’, as all the expansion impinges there first.

      Each birth means disruption on that planet but the birth is occasioned with a polarity reversal, meaning the Sun goes black, losing its photosphere. The Corona remains, so we get a cross, the Christ or a fluttering bird, The Phoenix, PX. With each polarity reversal, the Earth turns over, conserving spin. All the planets move away from the star. Gravity does not travel beyond pinches, but the momentum of the planets means they move to the next orbital in accordance with the Titus Bode formula. Electrity is vastly stronger than gravity. When power reumes, the star is smaller, hotter and has shed a planet or two. Stars are essentially hollow making matter in the photosphere through fusion by discharge.

      Clouds are water droplets…. they glide on double layers, minor pinches, until the charge leaks, destroying the ‘floor’ and allowing gravity to work.

  6. Yry says:

    @ Patrick Donnelly
    Thank you for your reply which had me mulling over these cosmic processes
    you kindly opened up for us.
    They are amazing yet they seem sufficiently reasonable to think it over from
    time to time. I’ll have to work out a visual environment to match this process
    of “making planets inside a star which will then escape from the Z-pinch to
    expand”. I’ll also have to imagine how Life managed to ‘live on’ including
    superior animals and hominid series under such fast changing conditions.

    I’ve come to suspect the first half of Egyptian civilization to have been
    witness to this kind of step changes when one examines their frescoes.
    Same reasoning with Indians from India.
    Like Tim, I don’t think our Earth timeline can go beyond a few tens of
    thousand years having taken a serious look at some planets & moons.

    Thanks again, cheers.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.