Cosmic Ray Blues – Lunar Luminosity

Lunar Luminosity

Albedo is a reflection coefficient ranging from zero to one.

Albedo, or reflection coefficient, derived from Latin albedo “whiteness” (or reflected sunlight) in turn from albus “white,” is the diffuse reflectivity or reflecting power of a surface.

It is the ratio of reflected radiation from the surface to incident radiation upon it.

Its dimensionless nature lets it be expressed as a percentage and is measured on a scale from zero for no reflection of a perfectly black surface to 1 for perfect reflection of a white surface.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo

Albedo

Asteroid 433 Eros, for example, is quite dark with an albedo of 0.25.

Asteriod 433 Eros

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/433_Eros

The Moon is darker than 433 Eros with an albedo of around 0.12 or 0.136 [depending upon source].

The overall albedo of the Moon is around 0.12, but it is strongly directional and non-Lambertian, displaying also a strong opposition effect.

While such reflectance properties are different from those of any terrestrial terrains, they are typical of the regolith surfaces of airless solar system bodies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Albedo

Albedo 0.136

Celestial body irradiance determination from an underfilled satellite radiometer: application to albedo and thermal emission measurements of the Moon using CERES.
Matthews, Grant (2008). Applied Optics 47 (27): 4981–93.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon

Therefore, in theory, a Full Moon should look a little darker than the “moon” in the following illustration which has an albedo 0.15.

Dark Moon

However, a Full Moon [even on a hazy night] shines down on Earth with an albedo of 1.0.

Blue moon from Thanh Hoa province, Vietnam

Some people attribute this additional [and anomalous] Lunar Luminosity to Earthshine.

Unfortunately, as can be seen in the picture below, Earthshine is only dimly reflected by the Moon while the lunar crescent that is illuminated directly by the Sun shines brilliant white.

Earthshine is reflected earthlight visible on the Moon’s night side.

It is also known as the Moon’s ashen glow or as the old Moon in the new Moon’s arms.

Earthshine is used to help determine the current albedo of the Earth.

The data are used to analyze global cloud cover, a climate factor.

Oceans reflect the least amount of light, roughly 10%.
Land reflects anywhere from 10–25% of the Sun’s light, and clouds reflect around 50%.

So, the part of the Earth where it is daytime and from which the Moon is visible determines how bright the Moon’s earthshine appears at any given time.

Earthshine

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthshine#Earthshine

The Earthshine explanation is imaginative but [none the less] it’s pure moonshine.

Luckily, there is an explanation for this visual anomaly [lurking in the dark recesses of Wikipedia].

The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory detected gamma rays from the Moon

The Compton Gamma Ray Observatory - Gamma Rays from the Moon

The Moon as seen by the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, in gamma rays of greater than 20 MeV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray

The Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) on the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory has detected gamma rays from the Moon as it passed through the instrument field of view several times between 1991 and 1994.

And [as we have seen] Gamma Rays trigger electromagnetic cascades in the Earth’s atmosphere which generate fluorescent light.

Cosmic Ray Showers

https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2013/12/01/cosmic-ray-blues-electromagnetic-shower/
https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2013/12/02/cosmic-ray-blues-hadronic-shower/

This is why Cherenkov telescopes [that are used for detecting cosmic rays] “can only function well on clear nights without the Moon shining”.

Detection methods
The first detection method is called the air Cherenkov telescope, designed to detect low-energy (<200 GeV) cosmic rays by means of analyzing their Cherenkov radiation, which for cosmic rays are gamma rays emitted as they travel faster than the speed of light in their medium, the atmosphere.

While these telescopes are extremely good at distinguishing between background radiation and that of cosmic-ray origin, they can only function well on clear nights without the Moon shining, and have very small fields of view and are only active for a few percent of the time.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray#Detection_methods

The full effect of the atmospheric fluorescence can be clearly identified in the following lunar image.

Earthshine reflecting off the Moon

The Lunar Gamma Rays are produced by Cosmic Ray bombardment of the Moon’s surface.

The average flux, and the energy spectrum of the lunar gamma radiation are consistent with a model of gamma ray production by cosmic ray interactions with the lunar surface, and the flux varies as expected with the solar cycle.

schematic of the lunar exosphere

The specific process is called sputtering.

Sputtering is a process whereby atoms are ejected from a solid target material due to bombardment of the target by energetic particles.

It only happens when the kinetic energy of the incoming particles is much higher than conventional thermal energies (≫ 1 eV).

This process can lead, during prolonged ion or plasma bombardment of a material, to significant erosion of materials, and can thus be harmful.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputtering

The sputtering process is initiated when the incident ion triggers a collision cascade.

Sputtering
Sputtering from a linear collision cascade.

The thick line illustrates the position of the surface, and the thinner lines the ballistic movement paths of the atoms from beginning until they stop in the material.

The purple circle is the incoming ion.

Red, blue, green and yellow circles illustrate primary, secondary, tertiary and quaternary recoils, respectively.

Two of the atoms happen to move out from the sample, i.e. be sputtered.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sputtering

The Cosmic Rays triggering the Lunar sputtering include Solar Cosmic Rays.

The sun seen in gamma rays

The sun as seen in gamma rays by COMPTEL during a June 15, 1991, solar flare.

Cataloging the gamma-ray universe, weighing black holes, and a hat trick
http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/compton_ast/

Overall, the mainstream have been very efficient when it comes to losing low energy Gamma Rays [aka Solar Cosmic Rays] down the back of the sofa.

Cosmic Ray Spectrum Gap

The Gamma Ray image of the Moon used in this posting, for example, was produced by the Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope [EGRET] on board NASA’s Compton Gamma Ray Observatory satellite.

The Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope (EGRET) was one of four instruments outfitted on NASA’s Compton Gamma Ray Observatory satellite.

Since lower energy gamma rays cannot be accurately detected on Earth’s surface, EGRET was built to detect gamma rays while in space.

EGRET was created for the purpose of detecting and collecting data on gamma rays ranging in energy level from 30 MeV to 30 GeV.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energetic_Gamma_Ray_Experiment_Telescope

EGRET was designed to detect gamma rays ranging from 30 MeV to 30 Gev [roughly 107 eV through to 1010 eV] and ignore the lower energy gamma rays [aka Solar Cosmic Rays] above 105.

Radiation below 100 keV is classified as X-rays and is the subject of X-ray astronomy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray_astronomy

However, the situation deteriorates in the published EGRET observations paper because only gamma rays above 100 MeV [108 eV] are included in the results.

Energetic gamma ray experiment telescope high-energy gamma ray observations of the Moon and quiet Sun

Energetic gamma ray experiment telescope
high-energy gamma ray observations of the Moon and quiet Sun

Thompson, Bertsch, Morris and Mukherjee.
Journal of Geophysical Research A7 102 (1997): 14730-4740. Print.
http://www.astro.umd.edu/~share/GLAST/references/quiet/thompson_moon_sun_jgr97.pdf

Therefore, EGRET was very successful at not observing Solar Cosmic Rays.

Advertisements
Gallery | This entry was posted in Astrophysics, Cosmic Rays, Earth, Inventions and Deceptions, Moon, Science, Solar System. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Cosmic Ray Blues – Lunar Luminosity

  1. Steven Oostdijk says:

    Instead of Gamma rays consider charge effects as Miles Mathis explains in this article: http://milesmathis.com/encel.pdf

    • malagabay says:

      From a recent paper from Miles Mathis I understand that “charge is light”.

      I have shown that charge is light.
      Both are composed of photons, and there is no difference between the two.
      http://milesmathis.com/poll.pdf

      From your recommended read I learn:
      “Enceladus is burning up in a white charge fire.”

      So lets take a closer look at this paper:

      Here is how it works: the low density of comets (compared to asteroids, say) allows the ambient charge field to partially dissolve the comet’s crust, creating the tail. Once we have the tail of small particles (dust or gas), the high residual speed of the gas allows it to interact with the charge field in a way that produces great brightness. In the ion tail, the ions are already spinning very fast—that is what ionization means. Ions are molecules that are charged, and “charged” means they are responding to charge photons in the field. Since the photons are spinning, part of that response will be induced spin.
      The dust is also spun by the charge field, although unlike the gas, it was initially spinning slowly or not at all. Although the ions don’t gain much spin (having spin before being emitted by the comet), the dust does gain spin. At any rate, both are spinning once they are ejected into the tail. This spin then
      meets the spin of the ambient field.

      Now let us return to the speed of Enceladus. I said that both Enceladus and comets gain charge brightness simply from speed, but I haven’t yet included that mechanism.

      For this reason, Enceladus encounters more charge each second than slower moons. Because it is far away from the Sun, it encounters more antiphoton charge, and the opposite spin of that charge gives us more photon spin cancellations as well as more photon diversions. These photon diversions cause an increased brightness.
      http://milesmathis.com/encel.pdf

      Personally, I am none the wiser.
      That doesn’t mean Miles Mathis is wrong.
      It just means that I don’t “get it”.
      Perhaps, with time [and a few more papers] I will finally “get it”.

  2. Pingback: Protecting Lunar Archaeology | MalagaBay

  3. Pingback: Carbon 14 – Seeing the Light | MalagaBay

  4. Pingback: Deranged Dating: The Big Picture | MalagaBay

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s